Gallery of Lights


Home Login
Album list Last uploads Last comments Most viewed Top rated My Favorites Search
Home > User galleries > Mercuryvapor123 > My lights
Westinghouse OV 25
To me one of the most attractive fixtures made. Back when this was built they took pride in what they did. NO fiberglass lights i.e DURASTARS.
Keywords: Misc_Fixtures

Westinghouse OV 25

To me one of the most attractive fixtures made. Back when this was built they took pride in what they did. NO fiberglass lights i.e DURASTARS.

152-5269_IMG.JPG 152-5262_IMG.JPG West25.JPG Westinghouse25_inside.JPG West_ballast25.JPG
File information
Filename:West25.JPG
Album name:Mercuryvapor123 / My lights
Keywords:Misc_Fixtures
Filesize:106 KiB
Date added:Mar 25, 2014
Dimensions:1024 x 768 pixels
Displayed:110 times
Color Space:sRGB
DateTime Original:2014:03:24 15:37:42
Exposure Bias:0 EV
Exposure Mode:0
Exposure Time:1/60 sec
FNumber:f/2.8
Flash:Flash, Auto-Mode
Focal length:5.40625 mm
Make:Canon
Max Aperture:f/2.8
Model:Canon PowerShot A40
URL:http://www.galleryoflights.org/mb/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=17240
Favorites:Add to Favorites

Comment 1 to 8 of 8
Page: 1

NiMo   [Mar 26, 2014 at 09:42 PM]
This was one of the most durable luminaires in the industry (I have three of them). 2nd generation with mismatched Holophane glass. This light was available with either Holophane or Corning glass refractors, depending on the year they were made.
Mercuryvapor123   [Mar 26, 2014 at 11:35 PM]
Cool I believe I have both Corning and Holophane I think the Corning one goes to my 1957 flat botom. One has the W without the ball points and one has the W with ball points and a circle with cross hairs below it.
streetlight98   [Mar 26, 2014 at 11:36 PM]
More durable than a M-400? I find that westinghouse lights always get stuck screws. Confused The castings themselves have always been very durable though. I noticed GE cheaped out around 1970 or so with thinner castings. My M-400 split door and my two M-250R1s are much thinner (and lighter) and than my 1967 M-250A. The M-250A's top housing looks filed down on the bottom too whereas my 70s GEs are rough on the edges of the casting (top of the doors, bottom of the top housings).

Now my OV-10IB's cast piece is almost 1/4" thick. Shocked Talk about one durable (and heavy!) sonovagun! I guess back then they didn't really have the technology to make the castings thinner though which is why they were thicker.
Mercuryvapor123   [Mar 26, 2014 at 11:44 PM]
I Think it may be more durable than the M-400 one time a tree limb fell on my 1957 flat bottom 25 and I was able to pound out the dent with a hammer now if you tried that with the M-400 it would probably crack the housing. I think it was that they just took pride in the workmanship back then.
streetlight98   [Mar 27, 2014 at 12:15 AM]
wow! pretty good! Shocked
NiMo   [Mar 27, 2014 at 10:00 PM]
The Corning glass was a different style altogether than the "traditional" Westinghouse refractors.
streetlight98   [Mar 28, 2014 at 12:45 AM]
Were the different refractor patterns used at specific times or was it just the case of whatever they could get their hands on first? btw, Was there a certain time that small GE lights used the deep glass versus the shallow glass? I tend to see M-250R1s and M-250As with both shallow and deep glasses and all were installed around the same time too. I personally prefer the deep glass on the M-250 lights though... Maybe with the exception of the 60s M-250R, which i think looks better with the shallow glass.
NiMo   [Mar 28, 2014 at 09:31 PM]
With Westinghouse/Cooper, it was a matter of WHEN they were made. The oldest refractor design with the big (W) logo was unique to the first generation flatbottoms. Same with General Electric

Comment 1 to 8 of 8
Page: 1