Gallery of Lights


Home Login
Album list Last uploads Last comments Most viewed Top rated My Favorites Search
Home > User galleries > gailgrove > My Collection
Return to the thumbnail page FILE 99/185 Return to start See previous file See next file Skip to end
Pure Mercury Brightness I don't think I need to say more XD Keywords: Lit_Lighting

Pure Mercury Brightness

I don't think I need to say more XD

DSC04578.JPG DSC01875~0.JPG DSC04254.JPG DSC04255.JPG DSC04257.JPG
File information
Filename:DSC04254.JPG
Album name:gailgrove / My Collection
Keywords:Lit_Lighting
Filesize:116 KiB
Date added:Dec 26, 2010
Dimensions:919 x 1000 pixels
Displayed:120 times
Color Space:sRGB
Contrast:0
DateTime Original:2010:12:25 19:51:18
Exposure Bias:0 EV
Exposure Mode:0
Exposure Program:Program
Exposure Time:1/250 sec
FNumber:f/3.2
Flash:No Flash
Focal length:7.64 mm
ISO:125
Light Source:Unknown: 0
Make:Sony
Max Aperture:f/2.8
Model:DSC-W210
URL:http://www.galleryoflights.org/mb/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=4386
Favorites:Add to Favorites

Comment 1 to 13 of 13
Page: 1

Tmcdllr   [May 13, 2012 at 01:00 AM]
No, you don't!
MercuryVapor175   [May 13, 2012 at 01:18 AM]
Is that lamp vintage/highly used?
BTW, it's not pure mercury, as a pure mercury light would have to be in a clear bulb. Wink
TiCoune66   [May 13, 2012 at 01:23 AM]
True that xD
streetlight98   [May 13, 2012 at 01:47 AM]
Don't question the power of the merc. Razz Laughing Cool
TiCoune66   [May 13, 2012 at 03:26 AM]
We're not. What we're doing is playing with words on Niall's pic title xD
joe_347V   [May 13, 2012 at 04:35 AM]
Well, for a pure mercury lamp you have to get rid of the outer bulb too, oh and the argon too. Laughing Laughing
gailgrove   [May 19, 2012 at 06:02 PM]
LOL guys, maybe it's not pure mercury brightness but it still pretty nice!
@MercuryVapor125 Yes this is vintage, however it is actually brand new!
streetlight98   [May 19, 2012 at 06:36 PM]
NOS? That's my favorite form of vintage lighting. Cool
MercuryVapor175   [May 19, 2012 at 08:43 PM]
@ Niall: I'm MercuryVapor175, not MercuryVapor125 Razz
gailgrove   [May 19, 2012 at 10:25 PM]
When your looking at stuff on a iPod Touch, making mistakes like that is pretty easy since it is smaller than my hand.
joe_347V   [May 19, 2012 at 10:34 PM]
Well, here's MercuryVapor125. Laughing
streetlight98   [May 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM]
Too many mercury vapors I guess: MercuryVapor175, mercuryvaporrocks, and Mercuryvapor123. Razz Laughing
MercuryVapor175   [May 19, 2012 at 11:18 PM]
Just off topic: This picture has blank email notifications.

Comment 1 to 13 of 13
Page: 1
Powered by Coppermine Photo Gallery